Re:Children of parents classified as “tiger” have worse grad...
by rickyc091 on Thursday May 09, 2013 @08:23PM
(#5683801)
The idea is that if they cut out all the extracurricular / social aspects of a child's life, then the child will have nothing better to do other than focusing on academia. Of course, in reality that doesn't happen. Children will rebel when they come to that age.
As for the no violin / piano. I think you have it wrong. It's "no musical instruments other than piano or violin." (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-03-06/news/ct-met-ti...)
Re:Children of parents classified as “tiger” have worse grad...
by RYUUSEiiSTAR on Thursday May 09, 2013 @08:57PM
(#5683914)
"Never allowed to:
- play any instrument other than the piano or violin
- not play the piano or violin.”
you read it wrong.
Re:Children of parents classified as “tiger” have worse grad...
by kaitai on Thursday May 09, 2013 @08:14PM
(#5683768)
Folks, the list is supposed to be funny. Of course it's over the top and somewhat arbitrary. The author knows it. She's also over the top and somewhat arbitrary.
Re:Children of parents classified as “tiger” have worse grad...
by illuminate on Thursday May 09, 2013 @11:00PM
(#5684311)
I think the phrase is "ha ha only serious".
Re:Children of parents classified as “tiger” have worse grad...
by sliverstorm on Thursday May 09, 2013 @10:48PM
(#5684268)
It's intended as a somewhat humorous wording of "you MUST play an instrument; your choices are piano or violin, NOTHING ELSE."
I am especially puzzled about the purpose of: "- play any instrument other than the piano or violin - not play the piano or violin." I just don't understand the logic behind this two restrictions.