Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible
by api on Thursday May 09, 2013 @01:16PM
(#5681639)
I'm becoming pretty convinced that the human future depends on the disruption and obsolescence of bureaucracies.
Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible
by spikels on Thursday May 09, 2013 @02:18PM
(#5682069)
I think you are on to something. When science became so big that it first needed then eventually was run by "managers" I bet it lost much of its effectiveness. But how do we change this? For starters there is a lot of money involved for the institutions conducting this (apparently shoddy) research.
Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible
by kanzure on Thursday May 09, 2013 @02:25PM
(#5682118)
> When science became so big that it first needed then eventually was run by "managers" I bet it lost much of its effectiveness.
You can just do projects on your own, you know. There's nothing about science that absolutely requires an institution.
Lately science looks like olympic games without anti-doping control...