News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible by spikels on Thursday May 09, 2013 @02:18PM (#5682069)
I think you are on to something. When science became so big that it first needed then eventually was run by "managers" I bet it lost much of its effectiveness. But how do we change this? For starters there is a lot of money involved for the institutions conducting this (apparently shoddy) research.
Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible by kanzure on Thursday May 09, 2013 @02:25PM (#5682118)
> When science became so big that it first needed then eventually was run by "managers" I bet it lost much of its effectiveness.

You can just do projects on your own, you know. There's nothing about science that absolutely requires an institution.

http://groups.google.com/group/diybio