Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible
by Ensorceled on Thursday May 09, 2013 @08:31AM
(#5680020)
It should not be the top comment. The original article is an explanation of WHY this was done. If a comment is posted explaining why the study was a bad idea or should not have been published despite this explanation THAT should be the top comment.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.