Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible
by insickness on Thursday May 09, 2013 @08:23AM
(#5679991)
Exactly. This should be the top comment. Are we just supposed to assume their work was true based on trust? Perhaps this 'study' was actually just a fleecing meant to show that we take too many studies to be true based on simple trust.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible
by Ensorceled on Thursday May 09, 2013 @08:31AM
(#5680020)
It should not be the top comment. The original article is an explanation of WHY this was done. If a comment is posted explaining why the study was a bad idea or should not have been published despite this explanation THAT should be the top comment.