News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wikipedia Adopts MariaDB by duwease on Wednesday May 01, 2013 @12:02PM (#5638765)
If it was me, I'd keep cranking out superior databases, selling them for a billion, and starting on the next one as fast as they'd buy em :)
Re:Wikipedia Adopts MariaDB by yyqux on Wednesday May 01, 2013 @05:31PM (#5640930)
I think it would be a bit premature to call MariaDB superior to MySQL.

Also it should be noted that the InnoDB storage engine was developed outside of MySQL AB. InnoDB is a helluva lot better than MyISAM for most applications because of performance and support for transactions, consistency, etc. Without it I don't think that MySQL would be a good candidate for many applications, particularly given that Postgres has improved a lot. I.e. I'm not sure Monty should really get credit for everything about MySQL/MariaDB.

Re:Wikipedia Adopts MariaDB by kbd on Wednesday May 01, 2013 @12:44PM (#5639068)
I think that's what Stonebreaker did with PostgreSQL, VoltDB, Vertica...
Re:Wikipedia Adopts MariaDB by haakon on Wednesday May 01, 2013 @01:43PM (#5639491)
Not sure if intentional, but Stonebreaker is an awesome misspelling of Stonebraker.
Re:Wikipedia Adopts MariaDB by kbd on Wednesday May 01, 2013 @02:29PM (#5639863)
Yes, I misspelled Stonebraker, thanks for the correction.