News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wikipedia Adopts MariaDB by AaronBBrown on Wednesday May 01, 2013 @11:54AM (#5638706)
MariaDB basically exists because of Monty's hatred for Oracle (which bought Sun after Sun bought MySQL for wheelbarrows full of money from Monty). It won't happen.
Re:Wikipedia Adopts MariaDB by duwease on Wednesday May 01, 2013 @12:02PM (#5638765)
If it was me, I'd keep cranking out superior databases, selling them for a billion, and starting on the next one as fast as they'd buy em :)
Re:Wikipedia Adopts MariaDB by yyqux on Wednesday May 01, 2013 @05:31PM (#5640930)
I think it would be a bit premature to call MariaDB superior to MySQL.

Also it should be noted that the InnoDB storage engine was developed outside of MySQL AB. InnoDB is a helluva lot better than MyISAM for most applications because of performance and support for transactions, consistency, etc. Without it I don't think that MySQL would be a good candidate for many applications, particularly given that Postgres has improved a lot. I.e. I'm not sure Monty should really get credit for everything about MySQL/MariaDB.

Re:Wikipedia Adopts MariaDB by kbd on Wednesday May 01, 2013 @12:44PM (#5639068)
I think that's what Stonebreaker did with PostgreSQL, VoltDB, Vertica...
Re:Wikipedia Adopts MariaDB by haakon on Wednesday May 01, 2013 @01:43PM (#5639491)
Not sure if intentional, but Stonebreaker is an awesome misspelling of Stonebraker.
Re:Wikipedia Adopts MariaDB by kbd on Wednesday May 01, 2013 @02:29PM (#5639863)
Yes, I misspelled Stonebraker, thanks for the correction.
Re:Wikipedia Adopts MariaDB by dyno12345 on Wednesday May 01, 2013 @10:03PM (#5642057)
Monty started MariaDB pretty much as soon as he left Sun, long before the Oracle acquisition, but shortly after he started criticizing the release of mysql 5.1 under Sun, which was widely regarded as botched.