Urchin.js is going dark? No, it isn't.

Posted by gscott on Monday April 13, 2009 @11:38PM
from the analytics.blogspot.com dept.

( 4 comments | 15 points | on HN )

Re:Urchin.js is going dark? No, it isn't. by Zev on Tuesday April 14, 2009 @03:36AM (#561150)

...or when you are ready to start taking advantage of the improved functionality.

This, to me, has the tone of "WTF, why haven't you switched yet? This new thing is shinier and fancier!" only in a nice and polite manner.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Urchin.js is going dark? No, it isn't. by enomar on Tuesday April 14, 2009 @04:27PM (#562278)

What's wrong with that? I don't blame them for wanting people to upgrade. The new version is probably easier for them to maintain.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Urchin.js is going dark? No, it isn't. by Zev on Tuesday April 14, 2009 @04:42PM (#562308)

Nothing's wrong with it. It just contradicts the tone the rest of the article tries to lay out.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Urchin.js is going dark? No, it isn't. by nikron on Tuesday April 14, 2009 @01:33AM (#561055)

This was kinda obvious. Why would Google just cut off its clients randomly? They aren't that evil.

[ Parent | on HN ]