Re:Over 25% of Verizon Wireless Traffic Is Now Over IPv6
by dfc on Wednesday April 24, 2013 @12:50PM
(#5602496)
I was a little surprised by your comment. Maybe I'm reading it wrong but it seems that you expect your service provider to filter traffic for you. I have the exact opposite expectation. Do you expect the same thing from your ISP at home?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Over 25% of Verizon Wireless Traffic Is Now Over IPv6
by mcpherrinm on Wednesday April 24, 2013 @04:42PM
(#5603832)
I do expect my service provider to filter packets for me. Not for any freedom-loving perspective, but for very practical ones:
My phone is battery powered. My cell phone link uses a lot of power when active compared to when inactive. I don't want some random ass killing my battery life by packet spamming me.
My cell phone provider charges me for data. Would that include random UDP packets spammed at my device?
The abuse potential is high enough that it concerns me. Having some sort of firewalling on the provider side seems straight up useful.
Re:Over 25% of Verizon Wireless Traffic Is Now Over IPv6
by twoodfin on Wednesday April 24, 2013 @03:09PM
(#5603332)
Of course not, but most consumers rely on default home router NAT configurations to at least protect them from drive by attacks on insecure devices. That's not an option in a mobile context, so I was curious at what level VZW expected their customers to be protected.