Opponents predict a bookkeeping nightmare. Online retailers would have to keep track of more than 9,000 sales-tax regimes. Internet companies in states with no sales taxes — Montana, New Hampshire, Oregon and Delaware — would have to build a collection apparatus from scratch.
Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, called the legislation “a targeted strike against the Internet and a targeted strike against the digital economy.”
As for the states that don't have sales tax, they can pay the clearing to provide a {"state":"0"} for all requests.
This is ignoring the fact that exemptions would be a nightmare.
The only thing I could think of that would be worse than needing to manage that massive API would be if I was a business owner who had to access multiple APIs for DC plus all the states with sales tax.
So you're saying that putting together that SAAS would be a slog and its very existence would be a moat to other people who don't want to slog through.
I.e., a great biz opportunity. :)
Who's with me? New start up.
Example: http://tax.cchgroup.com/sales-tax-data/default.htm?cookie_te...
You're talking about the government. They'll put it out for bid which will end up costing 3x as much as it should and be an ActiveX control that no one can use.
[1] - http://www.thetechgap.com/2010/12/who-to-blame-for-the-1099-...
Internet Sales Tax wouldn't be bad if it were uniformly imposed country wide (what amazon has pushed for). This specific bill, on the other hand, sounds like a nightmare.
The only saving grace being that at least states would be required to provide "software" - I can only hope that translates to APIs - to calculate taxes. That would make the problem significantly more manageable but it would still drastically increase the complexity of billing solutions for a lot of SMBs. The million dollar threshold is just too low for this to be anything but crushing for small businesses.