News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask PG: Has HN ever received a DMCA Takedown Notice? by elithrar on Saturday April 20, 2013 @07:48PM (#5583271)
> I missed it. Faxing still creates friction and significantly so for any attempt at bulk requests.

Does it? It's pretty easy to spool up a lot of faxes if you have an account with an email-to-fax service.

Re:Ask PG: Has HN ever received a DMCA Takedown Notice? by brudgers on Saturday April 20, 2013 @08:37PM (#5583369)
The faxes still come through serially with the receiving machine able to set the maximum rate of transmission. With one phone line and four minutes per fax that's a maximum of 360 requests per day. Send some long outgoing faxes and availability for receiving notices goes down.

In any event, spooling up a lot of faxes would tie up YC's fax machine, not YC's staff.

Re:Ask PG: Has HN ever received a DMCA Takedown Notice? by sbochins on Saturday April 20, 2013 @09:11PM (#5583465)
Couldn't you just use some online faxing service? That would prevent the 360 request/day limit you mentioned. I don't think any place sending mass DMCA take downs would be sending faxes themselves.
Re:Ask PG: Has HN ever received a DMCA Takedown Notice? by gwern on Saturday April 20, 2013 @09:33PM (#5583507)
I believe his point was that the bottleneck was on the receiving side, not the sending side.
Re:Ask PG: Has HN ever received a DMCA Takedown Notice? by chris_wot on Sunday April 21, 2013 @01:04AM (#5583929)
If it was from the one party, then that could be reasonably seen as trying to disrupt their service.
Re:Ask PG: Has HN ever received a DMCA Takedown Notice? by Oxxide on Saturday April 20, 2013 @07:59PM (#5583289)
I'm sure that's when the machine would become unplugged and the fax option stricken from the record.