Re:Ask PG: Has HN ever received a DMCA Takedown Notice?
by brudgers on Saturday April 20, 2013 @07:43PM
(#5583260)
I missed it. Faxing still creates friction and significantly so for any attempt at bulk requests.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask PG: Has HN ever received a DMCA Takedown Notice?
by elithrar on Saturday April 20, 2013 @07:48PM
(#5583271)
> I missed it. Faxing still creates friction and significantly so for any attempt at bulk requests.
Does it? It's pretty easy to spool up a lot of faxes if you have an account with an email-to-fax service.
Re:Ask PG: Has HN ever received a DMCA Takedown Notice?
by brudgers on Saturday April 20, 2013 @08:37PM
(#5583369)
The faxes still come through serially with the receiving machine able to set the maximum rate of transmission. With one phone line and four minutes per fax that's a maximum of 360 requests per day. Send some long outgoing faxes and availability for receiving notices goes down.
In any event, spooling up a lot of faxes would tie up YC's fax machine, not YC's staff.
Re:Ask PG: Has HN ever received a DMCA Takedown Notice?
by sbochins on Saturday April 20, 2013 @09:11PM
(#5583465)
Couldn't you just use some online faxing service? That would prevent the 360 request/day limit you mentioned. I don't think any place sending mass DMCA take downs would be sending faxes themselves.
Re:Ask PG: Has HN ever received a DMCA Takedown Notice?
by gwern on Saturday April 20, 2013 @09:33PM
(#5583507)
I believe his point was that the bottleneck was on the receiving side, not the sending side.