News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CipherCloud used DMCA Takedown on StackExchange discussio... by sergiotapia on Saturday April 20, 2013 @12:10AM (#5580113)
Why would you (or anyone) deliberately try to hurt a company? Just because their tech is not 'on par'? Please think about how it would hurt that company and the employees (and their families!).
Re:CipherCloud used DMCA Takedown on StackExchange discussio... by danbruc on Saturday April 20, 2013 @12:18AM (#5580166)
Why would a company (deliberately) try to sell a false sense of security to anyone whose knowledge of cryptography is not 'on par'? Please think about how it might hurt these customers and their employees (and their families!).
Re:CipherCloud used DMCA Takedown on StackExchange discussio... by mappu on Saturday April 20, 2013 @01:42AM (#5580440)
It's not about deliberately hurting a company; if it's possible to make such a script, it will be made. Period.

The question is: do you want the script publicly available, or in the hands of your adversaries without anyone knowing? There's a third alternative: fix the problem.

Re:CipherCloud used DMCA Takedown on StackExchange discussio... by PeterisP on Saturday April 20, 2013 @04:58AM (#5580831)
Fraudster companies SHOULD be hurt. And their employees should have been the ones that bring this to light - otherwise, they are accomplices and deserve whatever they get.
Re:CipherCloud used DMCA Takedown on StackExchange discussio... by puivert on Saturday April 20, 2013 @02:43AM (#5580584)
Exposing charlatans is commonly accepted. Elsewhere in the thread it was implied they hold peoples medical data (hipaa).
Re:CipherCloud used DMCA Takedown on StackExchange discussio... by qb45 on Saturday April 20, 2013 @04:40AM (#5580797)
I guess it's not about hurting a company but about hurting fraudsters. Their tech isn't "not on par" - it's pure nonsense and they know it.