News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Debate HN: Is Bitcoin a currency or a commodity? by Jtsummers on Thursday April 18, 2013 @11:10AM (#5571033)
A major problem with BTC as a reserve currency is the way it is generated (mining) and reclaimed (fees). An entity with significant computational power would be able to maintain significant control over the reserve currency. It's feasible that early adopters, then, would be holding significant percentages of the reserve currency. What would motivate later adopters to convert when they have perfectly viable reserves already (gold, USD, etc) that's more equitably (well, from their perspective at least) distributed?

Second problem, it requires a major shift in the motivation of many adopters (anti-fiat, anti-fractional reserve banking).

Re:Debate HN: Is Bitcoin a currency or a commodity? by GaryRowe on Thursday April 18, 2013 @12:28PM (#5571495)
Bitcoin is a protocol. There is nothing stopping the UN from creating their own currency using the Bitcoin protocol with all the characteristics they require of a reserve currency.
Re:Debate HN: Is Bitcoin a currency or a commodity? by Jtsummers on Thursday April 18, 2013 @01:06PM (#5571749)
It's also a thing that is attempting to be a currency/commodity. I suppose in any discussion we should make clear which aspect we're talking about. I was talking about the currency/commodity aspect as that's what this entire thread was started on. For the protocol, I agree with you.