News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Balancer Battle – Load testing HAproxy, Nginx and HTTP-Proxy's WebSocket support.

Re:Balancer Battle – Load testing HAproxy, Nginx and HTTP-Pr... by thebuccaneer on Tuesday April 09, 2013 @03:21PM (#5520486)
Where is Varnish in this mix?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Balancer Battle – Load testing HAproxy, Nginx and HTTP-Pr... by GibbyBorn on Tuesday April 09, 2013 @08:08PM (#5522346)
Varnish is slow as hell, see: http://todsul.com/nginx-varnish
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Balancer Battle – Load testing HAproxy, Nginx and HTTP-Pr... by thebuccaneer on Wednesday April 10, 2013 @02:40AM (#5523567)
And, yet, running the same test on my own varnish server yields 33k requests/sec with 50 concurrent requests and 28k requests/sec with 200 concurrent requests.

Something tells me that perhaps Tod Sul is doing something wrong.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Balancer Battle – Load testing HAproxy, Nginx and HTTP-Pr... by GibbyBorn on Wednesday April 10, 2013 @12:47PM (#5526317)
Absolute numbers are useless. Different hardware will produce different numbers.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Balancer Battle – Load testing HAproxy, Nginx and HTTP-Pr... by thebuccaneer on Wednesday April 10, 2013 @01:58PM (#5526823)
http://bit.ly/14XPD3O
[ Parent | on HN ]