Re:Google is just an amoral menace
by zandorg on Sunday April 05, 2009 @12:30PM
(#547477)
Don't cloud the issue by juggling words to say it's not a menace. It says amoral menace, which means regardless of morals, is a menace.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Clouding the issue?
I think there are two separate issues.
1.) Amoral: clearly; they are a corporate entity, not a human being
2.) Menace: who or what are they menacing? If you feel threatened, don't use their products.
"2.) Menace: who or what are they menacing? If you feel threatened, don't use their products."
Well, apparently they are "menacing" content producers on YouTube by [!shock!] deciding that rather than renegotiate higher payments per view they would prefer to stop purchasing the content.
I mean, how DARE Google stop buying the right to distribute someone's creations when the seller raises the price to a point where it's no longer profitable to be involved with the deal? That's evil if I've ever seen it...
Yeesh.