Re:India Supreme Court rejects Novartis' right to patent new...
by thatfloatingguy on Monday April 01, 2013 @08:50AM
(#5472698)
I think the whole evergreening and "patent a trivial change to our drug because the previous patent expiring" thing is wrong, but a company should profit after inventing a life-saving drug.
Look at it this way, if tomorrow a company came out with a complete cure for cancer, and we took away their right to profit from it, yes it'd put cancer victims in a good spot. But it'd screw everyone with a not-yet-cured disease over, when the company can't afford to pay employees, and the medical research industry goes down the drain.
People work for a profit, and that includes medical researches, who go through years of school. You take away that profit motive, they'll have to go do something else to put a roof over their head, and you'll save more lives in the short-term at a very high very long-term expense.
Re:India Supreme Court rejects Novartis' right to patent new...
by arpp on Monday April 01, 2013 @09:17AM
(#5472808)
Sure... US $58.566 billion (2011) is not enough profits
Re:India Supreme Court rejects Novartis' right to patent new...
by icebraining on Monday April 01, 2013 @09:31AM
(#5472862)
But they only have that profit because they have patents. You can't use it to justify the claim that patents are unnecessary.
The right to use certain information (aka patents) is more important than human life in our society.