News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on 10 000 concurrent real-time connections to Django. Parent comment

Re:10 000 concurrent real-time connections to Django by raverbashing on Wednesday March 27, 2013 @09:57AM (#5449377)
I understand that, and I'm not saying that there aren't several issues in Django (but some are getting better)

What I'm saying is that with PgBouncer you have Django <> PgBouncer <> Postgresql, right?

So what PgBouncer is doing (dealing with several open/close connections) maybe could be done better inside PostgreSQL

[ Parent | on HN ]

There are no comments on this comment yet.