Re:Jeff Bezos’ new patent envisions tablets without processo...
by ChuckMcM on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @12:56PM
(#5444539)
This is what annoyed me about this patent as well, its like saying "Dibs!" if someone can build this thing, we own it! Seriously? I'd write more but I'm busy writing up patents on Phase Conduits and Deflector arrays.
Re:Jeff Bezos’ new patent envisions tablets without processo...
by arethuza on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @01:06PM
(#5444620)
Actually, using patents in that way seems to have a long history - Feynman mentions something about having his name on a patent for nuclear powered aircraft in "Surely You're Joking, Mr Feynman".
Re:Jeff Bezos’ new patent envisions tablets without processo...
by vsh426 on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @01:47PM
(#5444900)
Similar story with Sony patenting brain interface[1] . Funny thing was after watching the Matrix the first time, me and a friend were debating why people would want to insert something directly into the skull and mess around with neurons possibly. I suggested using sound waves to trigger nerve signals, he laughed at silly idea and it was forgotten . A year later saw the Sony patent on slashdot and for a few minutes i really did think they had done some work on this, till i realized they had just called 'Dibs' on the idea.
[1] http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18624944.600-sony-pate...
Re:Jeff Bezos’ new patent envisions tablets without processo...
by maximilianburke on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @01:24PM
(#5444751)
At that time Feynman was filing patents on behalf of the government during wartime when there were other concerns than wildly trying to grasp any possible market. I would guess that the government was trying to ensure that individuals and corporations would not be in a position to obtain a monopoly on an invention that could gain the US a tactical/strategic advantage in the war.
Re:Jeff Bezos’ new patent envisions tablets without processo...
by georgemcbay on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @02:15PM
(#5445073)
Ah, the good old days, when the government would simply abuse the existing legal process to screw the little guy instead of just declaring a new process by fiat ala NSL/executive order/etc when it suits them.
It would be like someone realizing that we could send out electrical signals from a transmitter and catch them on a receiver. What would the radio guys have patented? They actually built a radio, the patent is for a broad idea.
If anyone brings this to fruition this should be invalidated. Someone must've patented wireless electric transmission decades ago (maybe even Tesla?) and having wifi for the content is even less special.
EDIT: typo.