News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I Bought A Firetruck by druiid on Sunday March 24, 2013 @05:21PM (#5433687)
Dude, it is a single firetruck, not a fleet of firetrucks being driven around to pick up groceries. If he were starting a trend, then yes perhaps this would be a-bad-thing. Instead, it's one guy fulfilling a lifelong dream. The gas mileage is going to be terrible and the emissions bad, but it's one firetruck.
Re:I Bought A Firetruck by carlob on Sunday March 24, 2013 @05:46PM (#5433846)
Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_imperative

Re:I Bought A Firetruck by baddox on Sunday March 24, 2013 @06:01PM (#5433928)
The maxim is simply "if you're really interested in fire trucks, and you can afford one, then you can buy one," and there's no problem with it becoming a "universal law," because very few people will be that interested in fire trucks.
Re:I Bought A Firetruck by mjhoy on Monday March 25, 2013 @04:06PM (#5439381)
Also, if everyone were to try to buy firetrucks, the price goes up — and makes me wonder how supply and demand fits in with the categorical imperative (if at all).
Re:I Bought A Firetruck by CamperBob2 on Sunday March 24, 2013 @08:44PM (#5434598)
Do you want to live in a world where I get to decide if your lifestyle will scale to seven billion people?

Because I'm thinking your computer would use less electricity and cause less CO2 pollution if it were half as fast as it is.

Re:I Bought A Firetruck by mhartl on Sunday March 24, 2013 @06:22PM (#5434050)
Kant was wrong.