News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Firefox: Why we won’t enable Do-Not-Track by default by zmmmmm on Thursday March 21, 2013 @02:43AM (#5413361)
The problem with "Do Not Track" is that it is misnamed, and the entire debate has been misframed around that. The feature was dead in the water from the moment it was called that.

To the end user, the idea of being tracked sounds like being followed around by some stalker, and is about as enticing as having your home robbed. People, in general, don't understand either the bad (the extent to which web sites can build a deep profile on you) or the good (how much of the web that everyone loves is financed through targeted advertising). As such, how things are presented is tremendously important.

Imagine if it was called "Disable Ad Personalisation", or even, "Do Not Tip" where the notion of denying monetization to the web sites you use (which is what Do Not Track will do) is invoked. It would have a very different response, I think.

Re:Firefox: Why we won’t enable Do-Not-Track by default by zobzu on Thursday March 21, 2013 @03:11AM (#5413479)
I'm thinking they named it that way on purpose. It has a lot of media coverage. It makes people more aware that they're losing the privacy they took for granted in the past, when using the web. The feature seems to have been adopted by many browsers now so i'd say its mostly successful - but even if it wasn't, the media impact probably makes it successful for them, IMO