Re:Firefox: Why we won’t enable Do-Not-Track by default
by 616c on Thursday March 21, 2013 @02:38AM
(#5413340)
Because it breaks websites. It blocked cookies for me on an FRAME (yes, I know) for a MasterCard SecureCode transaction for personal stuff on a local business site, and the website uses cookies to pass from one server to another and the transactions failed the following day when I enabled Do Not Track. Even companies like MasterCard cannot function with it enabled, how do we push smaller companies to get it done?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Firefox: Why we won’t enable Do-Not-Track by default
by KNoureen on Thursday March 21, 2013 @03:45AM
(#5413607)
Are you trolling us?
DnT is a HTTP header sent by the browser, it does not block or delete cookies.
On another note, cookies are domain specific, which means that a cookie can't be accessed by another domain.