News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The PyCon Incident by Joeboy on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @06:55PM (#5411133)
> Nobody is claiming that Adria is lying

The linked pastebin says "the "forking" reference turned out to be a fabrication".

Re:The PyCon Incident by llimllib on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @06:57PM (#5411149)
If this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5398681

is indeed a comment by the person who lost his job, then it does not seem to be.

Re:The PyCon Incident by tadfisher on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @07:12PM (#5411273)
> While I did make a big dongle joke about a fictional piece hardware that identified as male, no sexual jokes were made about forking. My friends and I had decided forking someone's repo is a new form of flattery (the highest form being implementation) and we were excited about one of the presenters projects; a friend said "I would fork that guys repo" The sexual context was applied by Adria, and not us.
Re:The PyCon Incident by jeltz on Thursday March 21, 2013 @08:56AM (#5414679)
That is my reading too. Still misunderstanding does not make something a lie.
Re:The PyCon Incident by andrewflnr on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @07:03PM (#5411202)
I don't recall exactly, but did she actually claim they said that, or just implicitly link the two guys with "other people" who make forking jokes?