Async I/O for Python 3

Re:Async I/O for Python 3 by pekk on Monday March 18, 2013 @02:10PM (#5396017)

Still puzzled why the primary inspiration for this is Twisted, which has some really ugly APIs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Async I/O for Python 3 by timc3 on Monday March 18, 2013 @02:12PM (#5396031)

Some people stick with what they know. Twisted is horrible to work with though

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Async I/O for Python 3 by zubinmehta on Monday March 18, 2013 @03:03PM (#5396400)

that rhymed!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Async I/O for Python 3 by ceronman on Monday March 18, 2013 @06:02PM (#5397466)

Twisted with inlineCallbacks is actually quite nice IMO. It's very similar to C# async/await.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Async I/O for Python 3 by jlgreco on Monday March 18, 2013 @08:13PM (#5398056)

Twisted's inlineCallbacks singlehandedly turn Twisted in my mind from an abomination into something that is a joy to work with. In lei of a more hands off Erlang/Go approach, I am convinced that style is the only way to go.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Async I/O for Python 3 by stock_toaster on Tuesday March 19, 2013 @01:45AM (#5399183)

inlineCallbacks made twisted palatable. It didn't make it good.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Async I/O for Python 3 by lucian1900 on Tuesday March 19, 2013 @01:06PM (#5402132)

Twisted has excellent APIs. Its Transport and Protocol abstractions in particular are extremely handy.

[ Parent | on HN ]