Re:Deep Learning - The Biggest Data Science Breakthrough of ...
by ergodic on Thursday March 14, 2013 @08:20PM
(#5378492)
>DNNs can be thought of a stacked Restricted Boltzmann Machines
Agree, as explained in Hinton et al 2006.
http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~hinton/absps/ncfast.pdf
But this is just for pre-training, as I said. If you look at Seides paper, they pre-train treating the MLP as a DBN and then they train it as a classic MLP with BP. Also using layer-wise BP pre-training does bring performance close to DBN pre-training, with no use of DBNs paradigms at all.
>Their structure and training is very different to traditional MLPs
I insist if we are talking of the same DNNs explained in Microsofts paper, this is not true. If we were to be talking about different DNNs please elaborate I would love to hear about that (seriously, no irony here).
Re:Deep Learning - The Biggest Data Science Breakthrough of ...
by jph00 on Thursday March 14, 2013 @11:02PM
(#5379018)
There's also the random knockout of neurons, as mentioned in the webinar.
I describe some of the key differences between DNNs and MLPs in the webinar. Also, the webinar explains how recent advances go far beyond just applications to speech recognition - in particular I focus on a case study in chemoinformatics.