News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Handshake Deal Protocol by argonaut on Thursday March 14, 2013 @01:40PM (#5376481)
Thanks you. A lot of people commenting on this thread don't seem to realize that oral contracts are just as legally valid as written contracts (as long as all the elements of a contact are present), email records notwithstanding.
Re:The Handshake Deal Protocol by driverdan on Thursday March 14, 2013 @02:21PM (#5376727)
Not necessarily. In New York state for example, it's required that any contract worth $500 or more be written. Oral contracts over $500 aren't enforceable.
Re:The Handshake Deal Protocol by praptak on Thursday March 14, 2013 @05:37PM (#5377830)
You could make a similar reservation about written contracts, as the scale of formality goes even higher. Some kinds of contracts require a notary and the worst ones might even require a priest or a rabbi :)
Re:The Handshake Deal Protocol by pdonis on Thursday March 14, 2013 @06:23PM (#5378041)
Doesn't an email count as written? I'm pretty sure there's case law on that. (Not sure about a text message, though.)
Re:The Handshake Deal Protocol by caw on Thursday March 14, 2013 @02:56PM (#5376943)
Still, you've got proof with this that someone is at least less than honorable, even if you can't legally force anything to happen.
Re:The Handshake Deal Protocol by 001sky on Thursday March 14, 2013 @04:00PM (#5377333)
Right. And under CA law...