News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Node v0.10.0 (Stable) by umphetico on Monday March 11, 2013 @01:54PM (#5358437)
Pretty much the same case here, I've abandoned LAMP stack completely. There's no need anymore, I am tired of having to google how to setup Apache config on some esoteric distro to see it fail when traffic spikes, I am not getting the best bang for the buck but with NodeJS, everything is so much easier.
Re:Node v0.10.0 (Stable) by gmac on Monday March 11, 2013 @03:00PM (#5358895)
(Though, of course, there are plenty of other alternatives to LAMP -- I find Nginx, Postgres, and Ruby or Python preferable in pretty much every way).
Re:Node v0.10.0 (Stable) by ebbv on Monday March 11, 2013 @03:53PM (#5359183)
I think having NodeJS serve up static content is a waste of time, and that's not its intended use case. So I'm with you. I set my server up with nginx serving up static content, and when an API call is made nginx proxies to my Node app.
Re:Node v0.10.0 (Stable) by umphetico on Tuesday March 12, 2013 @06:36AM (#5361068)
Why is it a waste of time? There are plenty of good solutions now like Hipache.
Re:Node v0.10.0 (Stable) by NuZZ on Tuesday March 12, 2013 @06:57AM (#5361110)
Perhpas he means it's a waste of cpu time :)
Re:Node v0.10.0 (Stable) by umphetico on Tuesday March 12, 2013 @06:41AM (#5361077)
All very good alternatives of course.