Seriously, Philly is great, but the crime is a real drag. I'm sure your neighborhood is very safe (comparatively) but is it safe compared to a typical SV neighborhood? (Let's not count Oakland. haha)
Now, I am comparing to SF, where all the technohipsters I know are spending thousands on rent. If you want to live in a suburb (which Mountain View etc are) then I'm pretty sure you have equally safe options here.
Granted our weather is shit by comparison, but you can't have everything.
The ambitious will simply take their ambition somewhere else...
Easier said than done.In that kind of atmosphere, I used my school library to learn web programming as much as possible, since our CS class was only teaching basic C++ (PHP just reached 3.0), and somehow, I scraped together enough cash (mostly borrowed) to put up a small website. By some miracle, I found work as a designer and with the basics I learned on several forums and with my pirated copy of Photoshop 5, I slowly made enough cash to pay rent and finally move to some place to stretch my limbs out.
It's a slow and painful transition that's impossible to do if you just "take their ambition somewhere else". No, I nurtured my ambition where I was until I could actually get somewhere else.
Empathy is a terribly scarce commodity it seems.
Not at all. The commenter was talking about something quite different than the article. The commenter was talking about the kids from the midwest etc. who move to San Francisco to strike it rich on the sweet oil fields of VC, which is the opposite of being stuck there because you are too broke to move.
So, yeah, the situation described was pretty much the same. As I said... empathy.
Perhaps I misread the thread but most everyone here appears to be quite empathetic to the problems raised by high housing costs.
I'm relatively certain the parent was referring to the entrepreneurial set rather than those who cannot currently (and will be even less able to in the future) afford to live in San Francisco.
If anything living outside SV might have made the process you went through easier if you could avoid a large portion of your earnings going solely to housing.
And I felt OP was being trite by only looking at it through his perspective (the entrepreneurial set), whereas the article was about the poor.
Example: We own a gorgeous 1550 sq ft house, built in the mid-1700s with lots of character, complete with 800 sq ft garden in what we believe is the coolest part of Philadelphia… and we pay less than $2400/mo including taxes and insurance.
Right around the corner, there are tons of tech biz (the kind that make money) including all the entrepreneurs at IndyHall, AppRenaissance, the makers of Postmark, etc., and everyone's favorite ecommerce-dev-shop-meets-bar-restaurant, Weblinc/National Mechanics.
And: we really splurged on our house. There are very nice 1br rentals from the mid-$1k right here, with new kitchens and lovely architectural details, and you could rent for half that if you were willing to take the subway 15 minutes.
Philly has a great entrepreneurial culture, a welcoming network, and it's cheap. Bonus: a newcomer here has more of a chance to distinguish themselves because the local "market" isn't flooded with a bunch of clones. A city can only support so many "ambitious" 22-year-olds before it becomes a sea of sameness and the fight to be noticed outweighs any potential for "networking."