News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Flat UI, mirrored by Retric on Friday March 08, 2013 @09:40AM (#5343641)
Your assuming someone nicked your stuff. With millions of sites out there are a lot of layouts, icons, and whatnot that look similar that are not in fact copy's. Worse designers are rarely the type of people that think of the (millions) ^ 2 possibilities.

Honestly, unless your talking about a large file with a lot of entropy your probably in the wrong sending a DMCA take-down request.

Re:Flat UI, mirrored by etchalon on Friday March 08, 2013 @11:55AM (#5344404)
"Worse designers are rarely the type of people that think of the (millions) ^ 2 possibilities."

Yes. Clearly designers are incapable of original thinking.

Generalizations are fun!

Re:Flat UI, mirrored by Retric on Friday March 08, 2013 @02:01PM (#5345054)
You misunderstand, many people assume when looking at rare events you need to consider the direct odds but forget about the false positive rate. Which is really more the preview of drug trials than design schools.
Re:Flat UI, mirrored by variousbagels on Friday March 08, 2013 @09:58AM (#5343737)
>Your assuming someone nicked your stuff

you're

>Honestly, unless your talking about a large file with a lot of entropy your probably

you're, you're

Re:Flat UI, mirrored by _puk on Friday March 08, 2013 @10:29AM (#5343914)
> that are not in fact copy's.

And you missed the inverse.. Pedantry is non constructive.

Re:Flat UI, mirrored by holms on Friday March 08, 2013 @10:20AM (#5343852)
mate and that's actually DOES NOT changes his point =) grammar Nazies should stop reading hacker news
Re:Flat UI, mirrored by to3m on Friday March 08, 2013 @11:13AM (#5344146)
I suppose spelling it like that is how you work round Godwin's law.