Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”
by TylerE on Monday March 04, 2013 @03:33PM
(#5320706)
That is a gross misinterpretation of the role of government. The government exists for the common welfare, but that doesn't mean it's a consumer advocate.
P.S: I think it fair to suggest that what the majority of consumers want is the cheapest possible phone. That means locked phones on subsidies.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”
by akarpenko on Monday March 04, 2013 @03:47PM
(#5320802)
It's the original role and the most important one. However it has evolved into more roles, obviously.
Regarding your second point, the assumption is that the government is rational. Adult-like and not child-like.
Once upon a time there was a group of people. They had common interests, but it was hard and inefficient to make decisions as a large group. So a government was formed to represent the individuals in the group and to tend to their common needs.
Let's go back to the present.
So one side is a big corporation that has one voice, the other side are consumers, i.e. people that have many voices. Government (at least a properly working one) is there to represent the will of the people and to give them a single voice. I don't see anything wrong with that.