News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CloudFlare was down by zhoutong on Sunday March 03, 2013 @05:26AM (#5313238)
CloudFlare offers CNAME option for paid customers. So you can use an enterprise DNS service and only point to CloudFlare via a CNAME record.

When disasters like this happen, a quick DNS change can be a life-saver.

Re:CloudFlare was down by foobar2k on Sunday March 03, 2013 @05:28AM (#5313244)
There's no such thing as a quick DNS change.
Re:CloudFlare was down by zhoutong on Sunday March 03, 2013 @05:32AM (#5313259)
My startup NameTerrific can support instantaneous DNS updates in a geo-redundant Anycast infrastructure. As long as your TTL is sufficiently low (<300), the impact is quite limited as propagation time is negligible at NameTerrific.

EDIT: Sorry guys. We got some issues with a gem after installing the recently updated ruby2.0.0p0. The unicorn workers were timing out. TerrificDNS is completely unaffected and the site is already running again.

Re:CloudFlare was down by Uchikoma on Sunday March 03, 2013 @06:02AM (#5313348)
Not the best advertising

http://www.nameterrific.com

"502 Bad Gateway

nginx/1.2.7"

Re:CloudFlare was down by Nux on Sunday March 03, 2013 @06:33AM (#5313406)
Hopefully the back-end is not running Ruby. ;-)
Re:CloudFlare was down by rdl on Sunday March 03, 2013 @06:56AM (#5313437)
The back-end is AWS Route53, it seems.
Re:CloudFlare was down by zhoutong on Sunday March 03, 2013 @07:27AM (#5313498)
Well, we have already soft launched our own TerrificDNS Anycast and it has replaced the Route 53 solution. TerrificDNS platform is running on Redis + PowerDNS.
Re:CloudFlare was down by Uchikoma on Sunday March 03, 2013 @08:50AM (#5313706)
Terrific.
Re:CloudFlare was down by zhoutong on Sunday March 03, 2013 @06:24AM (#5313383)
It's up now. Please see parent for explanation. Sorry!
Re:CloudFlare was down by avargas on Sunday March 03, 2013 @05:38AM (#5313272)
https://www.nameterrific.com/pricing

"We're sorry, but something went wrong."

Re:CloudFlare was down by Uchikoma on Sunday March 03, 2013 @06:00AM (#5313339)
From my experience with DNS for a large site over the last years, a lot of ISPs do not respect your TTL and have their own TTL (often 24h).
Re:CloudFlare was down by rdl on Sunday March 03, 2013 @05:56AM (#5313331)
If and only if the site's end users and their software fully respects TTL. A lot don't, especially shitty mobile networks and web browsers.
Re:CloudFlare was down by sturadnidge on Sunday March 03, 2013 @06:09AM (#5313360)
You should probably put the same amount of effort into your web hosting infrastructure http://imgur.com/ok5lfml
Re:CloudFlare was down by gtklocker on Sunday March 03, 2013 @06:05AM (#5313354)
Nameterrific is down. https://www.nameterrific.com/
Re:CloudFlare was down by thomseddon on Sunday March 03, 2013 @07:46AM (#5313540)
Would love some details on how to do this, I've been a (business) CF customer for a while now and have never seen this service and I haven't turned up anything googling/scouring their website for it just now.

Details much appreciated!

EDIT: Spoke too soon: https://support.cloudflare.com/entries/22054357-how-do-i-do-... shame it's so convoluted

Re:CloudFlare was down by ksec on Sunday March 03, 2013 @09:36AM (#5313852)
That is the first time i have heard this as well. Thanks for the Link.
Re:CloudFlare was down by earless1 on Sunday March 03, 2013 @05:43AM (#5313288)
Yup, this CNAME service just allowed me to make a quick update to DNS and get us back up. We will probably need to automate this in the future.
Re:CloudFlare was down by overshard on Sunday March 03, 2013 @05:29AM (#5313249)
Yep, this is definitely something I'll do in the future and I guess it was my fault for trusting a single service... even one that is designed around keep your site up/redundant.