News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What really happened at LivingSocial? by lawdawg on Thursday February 21, 2013 @01:39PM (#5259166)
They count it as revenue before paying the merchant. Their true revenue is probably much lower than $500mm.
Re:What really happened at LivingSocial? by zpconn on Thursday February 21, 2013 @02:07PM (#5259383)
It's amazing how many companies have tried to pull this little accounting trick, or variations of it. Most of them have failed or else fallen from glory.
Re:What really happened at LivingSocial? by ebbv on Thursday February 21, 2013 @02:17PM (#5259467)
Ahhhh, ok. That seems like shady accounting to me, then. Calling any money "revenue" before the merchants get their share.
Re:What really happened at LivingSocial? by jordo37 on Thursday February 21, 2013 @02:52PM (#5259808)
That's not shady accounting, revenue is the income a company receives before handling any expenses, which in this case would include payment of merchants. This is why revenue is called the top-line - it represents the first number on any balance sheet before you subtract anything away.
Re:What really happened at LivingSocial? by thetrb on Thursday February 21, 2013 @01:53PM (#5259279)
If they keep ~50% of the coupon price wouldn't that just mean $250mm then? Still a big number.
Re:What really happened at LivingSocial? by endtime on Thursday February 21, 2013 @02:12PM (#5259426)
They have 4000 employees. If they cost (salary + benefits + taxes + etc.) $100k a year each, on average, then that'd be $400m.