Re:What really happened at LivingSocial?
by lawdawg on Thursday February 21, 2013 @01:39PM
(#5259166)
They count it as revenue before paying the merchant. Their true revenue is probably much lower than $500mm.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What really happened at LivingSocial?
by zpconn on Thursday February 21, 2013 @02:07PM
(#5259383)
It's amazing how many companies have tried to pull this little accounting trick, or variations of it. Most of them have failed or else fallen from glory.
Ahhhh, ok. That seems like shady accounting to me, then. Calling any money "revenue" before the merchants get their share.
Re:What really happened at LivingSocial?
by jordo37 on Thursday February 21, 2013 @02:52PM
(#5259808)
That's not shady accounting, revenue is the income a company receives before handling any expenses, which in this case would include payment of merchants. This is why revenue is called the top-line - it represents the first number on any balance sheet before you subtract anything away.