News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Static site generation on python by rplnt on Thursday February 14, 2013 @06:47AM (#5219012)
I tried pelican several times, but I always found it to be too complicated to what I want. I went through setup, generated some pages and when I started to tinker around with it I had a feeling it would be easier to write something from scratch.

Do you know any other static page generators, simpler and preferably in Python as well? Or should I just get over the first impression and go with the pelican?

Re:Static site generation on python by loftsy on Thursday February 14, 2013 @07:46AM (#5219175)
Django can be easily adapted to write static pages using the template api and writing to a file. Works well for me.
Re:Static site generation on python by ramayac on Thursday February 14, 2013 @09:57AM (#5219685)
Exactly good sir, that is a great way to go :)
Re:Static site generation on python by brass9 on Thursday February 14, 2013 @10:21AM (#5219800)
I use nanoc (http://nanoc.ws/). It's written in Ruby - but it's quite powerful yet so very simple to use.

I've split hair over jekyll/octopress configuration until I stumbled upon this nimble beauty... haven't looked back since.

Give nanoc a try.

Re:Static site generation on python by nry on Thursday February 14, 2013 @09:48AM (#5219639)
I had the same feeling when I was using pelican as well. I have switched my personal site over to blogofile: http://www.blogofile.com/

Much simpler and better documentation in my opinion.