News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Opera moves to WebKit by cpeterso on Wednesday February 13, 2013 @03:35AM (#5212028)
I wonder if Opera is making an overture to get acquired by Google or Apple. Opera's innovative browser features have always been a bigger draw than the details of its Presto rendering engine.
Re:Opera moves to WebKit by UnoriginalGuy on Wednesday February 13, 2013 @04:27AM (#5212190)
I seriously doubt it.

What IP or userbase does Opera have that either Google or Apple would want? If either of the two of them wanted to copy Opera's browser features they would just go ahead and do so.

If anything this makes Opera less interesting as a potential purchase. Their rendering engine was a massive piece of original IP.

Re:Opera moves to WebKit by rplnt on Wednesday February 13, 2013 @04:40AM (#5212233)
> If either of the two of them wanted to copy Opera's browser features they would just go ahead and do so.

They mostly do. Dozens and dozens and features. But it works other way around as well, and it's a great thing in the end. The most beneficial features are virtually on every browser.

Re:Opera moves to WebKit by Dylanlacey on Wednesday February 13, 2013 @05:26PM (#5216102)
As an aside, feature copying was one of the greatest sources of irritation my friends had when Opera was still this really weird, unique thing that I used and they didn't. It was quite regular to have them excitedly tell me to switch to Firefox because "Dude, there's tabbed browsing, it's SO great!" Uh, thanks, I've... I've had that for years. But I'm glad you're discovering it too!
Re:Opera moves to WebKit by mcpoulet on Wednesday February 13, 2013 @07:27AM (#5212698)
Opera is a huge hit in asia. And this is where Apple and Google struggle the most to get market share. That would make a lot of sense for either of them to try to acquire Opera.
Re:Opera moves to WebKit by geon on Wednesday February 13, 2013 @05:06AM (#5212300)
> Their rendering engine was a massive piece of original IP.

How can it be worth anything when the competition is free?

Re:Opera moves to WebKit by gcp on Wednesday February 13, 2013 @06:25AM (#5212531)
If it runs faster, with less memory, or is easier to port to new platforms that the other browsers have problems reaching.

Do you remember how long it took Google to port Chrome to Android? There was a Firefox and Opera release for Android even before Google got their own browser ported to their own OS.

Re:Opera moves to WebKit by estel on Wednesday February 13, 2013 @07:11AM (#5212655)
But that wasn't a problem with Chrome's rendering engine: there were plenty of WebKit browsers on Android from the start (including Browser).
Re:Opera moves to WebKit by gcp on Wednesday February 13, 2013 @08:58AM (#5213047)
Yes, but they were all using the platform version, which was older. Porting the new features took time.
Re:Opera moves to WebKit by ImprovedSilence on Wednesday February 13, 2013 @12:45PM (#5214447)
>>There was a Firefox and Opera release for Android even before Google got their own browser ported to their own OS.

That's why I installed opera on my phone. It works so good, I never bothered to install chrome on it. So it looks like I'm an Opera user. Granted I still use chrome/FF on everything else...

Re:Opera moves to WebKit by kmfrk on Wednesday February 13, 2013 @08:29AM (#5212948)
The founder sold a lot of stocks recently (yesterday), bringing his controlling stock below the percentage where he can block an acquisition.

It definitely feels like the winds of change.

EDIT: Found the article: http://www.arcticstartup.com/2013/02/12/opera-founder-sells-....

Re:Opera moves to WebKit by gbrindisi on Wednesday February 13, 2013 @06:24AM (#5212526)
If I'm not wrong Opera has already been acquired by Facebook.
Re:Opera moves to WebKit by toyg on Wednesday February 13, 2013 @06:56AM (#5212607)
No. There were rumours, and maybe something more than that (I know somebody whose hiring fell through because Opera went into the typical pre-acquisition "lockout mode", about a year ago), but in the end nothing happened.