Re:Linode vs. DigitalOcean – performance benchmarks
by beigeotter on Tuesday February 12, 2013 @11:35AM
(#5207807)
Thank you for raising this issue. We try to make our terms of service as fair as possible—we are not looking to censor any information or content on our customers' droplets.
As you have raised this issue, to make the situation clearer, the phrase referring to obscenity and profanity has been removed from our terms of service.
Thanks,
Etel
Re:Linode vs. DigitalOcean – performance benchmarks
by aflott on Tuesday February 12, 2013 @12:16PM
(#5208054)
I recently signed up with Digital Ocean and I'm now happier I did due to responses like this.
Re:Linode vs. DigitalOcean – performance benchmarks
by bitcartel on Tuesday February 12, 2013 @12:11PM
(#5208021)
Good spot. Also if you Google you can find the exact same TOS on other sites. It's just generic boiler-plate.
Re:Linode vs. DigitalOcean – performance benchmarks
by armored_mammal on Tuesday February 12, 2013 @12:23PM
(#5208095)
Yeah, I'm sure it's not anything unusual. Probably I'd have not even paid attention except that their TOS was short enough to breeze through to begin with.
I think it's funny how they can go from barring any information "offensive, abusive, inappropriate, malicious, or detrimental, including, but not limited to, those that: Are obscene, fraudulent, or discriminatory, including any containing profanity, or obscenities" to specifically permitting "adult websites that abide by state and federal law and regulation."
In any case good, luck keeping your blog, blog, comments, or whatever else you host with them clear of all profanity all of you who decide to try their services, because you've just walked into a convenient TOS violation. Damn! (Oops. TOS violation. Goodbye HN. Ha ha.)