News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on What's the point of writing good scientific software?.

Re:What's the point of writing good scientific software? by ozataman on Friday February 08, 2013 @03:57PM (#5190096)
A big concern for me has always been correctness. You're more likely to make mistakes and miss edge conditions in sloppy code. There's nothing worse than communicating some positive/inspiring results, only to find out later that you had an elusive computational bug in there that invalidates the results.

This reminds me: A man was seen cutting a tree down with a dull bladed axe. A bystander asked him "Why not sharpen your axe first?". The cutter responded "I don't have the time!".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:What's the point of writing good scientific software? by michaelbarton on Friday February 08, 2013 @04:06PM (#5190149)
I agree with respect to writing correct scientific software. I think in many cases though bugs are not found because who is going to download the software and test the conclusions? Unless it's a very big result, e.g. an arsenic backbone for DNA, few academics will spend the time to validate others results in this level of detail.
[ Parent | on HN ]