News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What's the point of writing good scientific software? by michaelbarton on Friday February 08, 2013 @03:07PM (#5189823)
I have a feeling that there is great deal of buggy software in biology. Taking non-scientific software for example such as Rails, if there is a bug this becomes obvious a page is loaded incorrectly or a model is pulled incorrectly from the database.

In contrast imagine an academic scenario where I'm testing a hypothesis using someone else's software. How do I notice a bug? I'll notice the bugs where the output is in the wrong format for example. More subtle bugs I won't notice because I don't have any expectation on the results. This will affect the conclusion I draw though.

There are no comments on this comment yet.