Re:What's the point of writing good scientific software?
by michaelbarton on Friday February 08, 2013 @03:07PM
(#5189823)
I have a feeling that there is great deal of buggy software in biology. Taking
non-scientific software for example such as Rails, if there is a bug this
becomes obvious a page is loaded incorrectly or a model is pulled incorrectly
from the database.
In contrast imagine an academic scenario where I'm testing a hypothesis using
someone else's software. How do I notice a bug? I'll notice the bugs where the
output is in the wrong format for example. More subtle bugs I won't notice
because I don't have any expectation on the results. This will affect the
conclusion I draw though.
In contrast imagine an academic scenario where I'm testing a hypothesis using someone else's software. How do I notice a bug? I'll notice the bugs where the output is in the wrong format for example. More subtle bugs I won't notice because I don't have any expectation on the results. This will affect the conclusion I draw though.