News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The result of pinging all the Internet IP addresses by MichaelGG on Thursday February 07, 2013 @07:10PM (#5185387)
"The increased complexity came from the disk storage resources; "

It seems they just stored if they got a response or not.

4 billion IPs, and if all you need to store is if you received a response, that's only half a gig of RAM. mmap and call it a day?

Re:The result of pinging all the Internet IP addresses by e2e8 on Thursday February 07, 2013 @08:05PM (#5185637)
They recorded the whole response. "...and the second one simply writes down the response packets received." They also randomized the order in which they scanned so they might have needed to keep track of already scanned addresses. "Although we have sent just a single packet per IP, we messed the scans to prevent a network receiving a high number of consecutive packets."
Re:The result of pinging all the Internet IP addresses by jevinskie on Thursday February 07, 2013 @09:03PM (#5185860)
You can use a LFSR[0] to efficiently (it is deterministic, minimal state) convert a sequential power of two range [0, 2^n-1] into one that appears to "randomly" walk around.

[0]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_feedback_shift_register

Re:The result of pinging all the Internet IP addresses by tonyedgecombe on Friday February 08, 2013 @03:16AM (#5186851)
Or just reverse the bits in the address.
Re:The result of pinging all the Internet IP addresses by mrab on Thursday February 07, 2013 @10:15PM (#5186096)
Yeah, I could think of a handful of ways to do this easily without as much resources as stated...