News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What happened with LEGO by bentcorner on Thursday February 07, 2013 @11:29AM (#5182948)
The reason why Lego makes sets that are branded is because other companies make good-enough lego-compatible blocks that are cheaper than legos. If lego stuck with the "generic sets only", they'd be history by now. Who would bother buying a pack of lego-branded red bricks when you could get the megablocks-branded one that is 90% as good for half the price?
Re:What happened with LEGO by sbarlster on Thursday February 07, 2013 @11:45AM (#5183063)
The megablocks stuff we have bought either has nobbly extra molding bits still stuck to the bricks meaning they just don't work OR the bricks are not of a uniform enough size so they don't stick together for any length of time.

I would estimate at 40% as good as logo. Which puts it down in the play with it a bit and then ignore 'while the cat (or hoover) eats it' camp.

Re:What happened with LEGO by rdouble on Thursday February 07, 2013 @11:32AM (#5182970)
Only the dorky neighbor kid whom everyone hated to play with thought megablocks were an acceptable substitute for Lego.
Re:What happened with LEGO by trhtrsh on Thursday February 07, 2013 @03:13PM (#5184245)
Yeah, poor people are losers.