Re:Hapi, new Node.js framework (a prologue)
by javajosh on Sunday February 03, 2013 @12:53AM
(#5158818)
This certainly looks like the best "traditional style" webapp framework yet for node - e.g. something that reminds me strongly of a well-apportioned SpringMVC setup.
That said, I'm a huge fan of Meteor. It is (almost) totally non-traditional, but granted it does not give you the fine-grained control of this framework. I can see Hapi being the correct choice if either a) your developers are uncomfortable with large paradigm shifts (and seriously, who can blame them?) or b) you have to conform to a pre-existing API that requires low-level control (which is, of course, a total bummer).
Very nice work - and from my skimming of your docs, very nice documentation. Lots of good info in there without a lot of fluff, and I like that it's all on one page. Kudos. I'll definitely try Hapi instead of Connect next time I need something like this.
In particular, I'm excited about the way endpoints are registered:
// Define the route
var hello = {
handler: function (request) {
request.reply({ greeting: 'hello world' });
}
};
// Add the route
server.addRoute({
method: 'GET',
path: '/hello',
config: hello
});
This makes it extremely easy to expose API endpoints to internal modules. Let's
say your company has a module related to simple math operations -- exposing this
externally is as simple as adding a 'handler' method.
var SimpleMath = new function() {
var module = this;
module.divide = function(a, b) {
return a / b;
};
module.multiply = function(a, b) {
return a * b;
};
// Now add the external handler.
module.handler = function(request) {
// somehow access two variables, a and b
request.reply({
product: module.multiply(a, b);
quotient: module.divide(a, b);
});
}
Re:Hapi, new Node.js framework (a prologue)
by adamnemecek on Sunday February 03, 2013 @04:13AM
(#5159167)
I believe that peter_l_downs was using this exotic literary device called an "example".
When you read about class inheritance, was your first reaction "This is useless, why would I ever want to have a Dog class which is based on an Animal class"?
Re:Hapi, new Node.js framework (a prologue)
by account_taken on Sunday February 03, 2013 @05:34PM
(#5161505)
nm. I didn't see the example was returning two properties. Still, that is relatively easy to do. I have a middleware that does that and it's very short not yet another framework.
Re:Hapi, new Node.js framework (a prologue)
by benatkin on Sunday February 03, 2013 @03:33AM
(#5159094)
> We also looked at Restify, Tako, and a few others.
With the long list of things checked out, I doubt they gave the "few others" a close look. Which is too bad, because Geddy may have been just the ticket.
Re:Hapi, new Node.js framework (a prologue)
by tbrock on Sunday February 03, 2013 @11:47AM
(#5160123)
While I know multitudes of new frameworks are usually unwelcome wheel reinventions, this seems very well done. Kudos to the team.
Releasing software like this makes me wonder what other kind of amazing things are going on at Walmart Labs. They have an incredible amount of data about shopping behavior.
Re:Hapi, new Node.js framework (a prologue)
by joelcox on Sunday February 03, 2013 @12:32PM
(#5160302)
One of the guys who is working on this is Eran Hammer, who also co-authored several OAuth specs. He's working on OAuth alternative called Oz (https://github.com/hueniverse/oz).
Re:Hapi, new Node.js framework (a prologue)
by anthem001 on Sunday February 03, 2013 @12:27PM
(#5160278)
Played with it a bit last night. Initial impression is it has a much lighter feeling than other frameworks I've tried. Will be diving in deeper for sure.
That said, I'm a huge fan of Meteor. It is (almost) totally non-traditional, but granted it does not give you the fine-grained control of this framework. I can see Hapi being the correct choice if either a) your developers are uncomfortable with large paradigm shifts (and seriously, who can blame them?) or b) you have to conform to a pre-existing API that requires low-level control (which is, of course, a total bummer).
Very nice work - and from my skimming of your docs, very nice documentation. Lots of good info in there without a lot of fluff, and I like that it's all on one page. Kudos. I'll definitely try Hapi instead of Connect next time I need something like this.
In particular, I'm excited about the way endpoints are registered:
This makes it extremely easy to expose API endpoints to internal modules. Let's say your company has a module related to simple math operations -- exposing this externally is as simple as adding a 'handler' method.I'm sorry but how is that different than
where simplemath isWith the long list of things checked out, I doubt they gave the "few others" a close look. Which is too bad, because Geddy may have been just the ticket.
Releasing software like this makes me wonder what other kind of amazing things are going on at Walmart Labs. They have an incredible amount of data about shopping behavior.
Thanks for releasing this guys!