Re:Antigua gets OK to become copyright haven
by tolmasky on Monday January 28, 2013 @10:24PM
(#5132159)
The hilarious part is that if the reasoning really is that one doesn't want to see it being done near their home, then online gambling is ideal. People would do it "in the privacy of their own homes", and I think you'd quickly find people preferring it to going to a building (due to ease and sheer variety). The brick and mortar places "attract riff raff" precisely because they are by definition concentrations of theoretically socially unacceptable behavior, which are then additionally usually combined with alcohol sale.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Antigua gets OK to become copyright haven
by eric-hu on Tuesday January 29, 2013 @12:15AM
(#5132463)
I believe the nimby stance against gambling is that it creates poverty. An opponent with such a stance might say something to the effect of "People are only keeping this in the privacy of their own homes until they run out of money. Then they start performing crimes in our neighborhood to feed their addiction."
I don't agree with this stance, but I've heard it made before.
Re:Antigua gets OK to become copyright haven
by tedunangst on Monday January 28, 2013 @10:46PM
(#5132208)
Yeah, I don't really know where online gambling fits in. Though some people probably like that gambling is inconvenient because they have poor impulse control. "I want you to stop me from doing this thing I'm gonna want to do later before I regret it."
Re:Antigua gets OK to become copyright haven
by semanticist on Tuesday January 29, 2013 @09:09PM
(#5137673)
To get a gaming licence for an online gambling game in the UK, you need to provide a mechanism to allow players to block themselves from playing.
It's not hard to make that kind of requirement, if it were the real reason online gambling is restricted.
Re:Antigua gets OK to become copyright haven
by darkchasma on Monday January 28, 2013 @11:20PM
(#5132302)
Not my monkey, not my circus.