News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Darpa shows off 1.8-gigapixel drone, can spot a person fr... by rayiner on Monday January 28, 2013 @01:15PM (#5129735)
Without major advances in artificial intelligence technology, drones have a key weakness: the wireless link. Miniaturization may win the drones arms race, which makes drones accessible to non-governmental actors, but when it comes to controlling the spectrum, bigger is better. So governmental actors are always going to have an advantage because they can build the biggest antennas attached to the biggest power sources.
Re:Darpa shows off 1.8-gigapixel drone, can spot a person fr... by ceejayoz on Monday January 28, 2013 @01:19PM (#5129756)
Not a problem if you know where the target's going to be.

Imagine a swarm of explosive-carrying drones hitting the President's podium at inaguration from a dozen different directions. Known time, known position, open-air approaches. Must be something that keeps the Secret Service up at night.

Re:Darpa shows off 1.8-gigapixel drone, can spot a person fr... by mseebach on Monday January 28, 2013 @01:35PM (#5129859)
This kind of drones are relatively slow. The perimeter around in the president in any exposed situation is pretty large. Any appearance of unidentified flying objects on the scene is likely to trigger an evacuation of any key targets. For the kind of payloads small drones can carry, and with no possibility of changing the target, you don't even need to move the target very far for the strike to be non-lethal.

On the other hand, you could build a cruise missile (essentially a drone) that might be big and fast enough to hit your target. But those date back to WWII, so if they keep the Secret Service up at night, it's a pretty exhausted security detail by now.

Re:Darpa shows off 1.8-gigapixel drone, can spot a person fr... by jacquesm on Monday January 28, 2013 @01:22PM (#5129779)
Consider the possibility that you just levelled up in a couple of database tables.
Re:Darpa shows off 1.8-gigapixel drone, can spot a person fr... by tptacek on Monday January 28, 2013 @10:52PM (#5132227)
You're not serious, right? If joke: funny. If serious: worrying.
Re:Darpa shows off 1.8-gigapixel drone, can spot a person fr... by jacquesm on Tuesday January 29, 2013 @02:26AM (#5132820)
Definitely a joke, if you're serious that's even more worrying ;)

Still, people have been lifted from their beds for tweets about such things.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/obama-twitter-death-thre...

Granted that was slightly more specific threat, but this being hacker news that ggp already has a strike against ;)

Re:Darpa shows off 1.8-gigapixel drone, can spot a person fr... by rayiner on Monday January 28, 2013 @01:28PM (#5129814)
Designing a drone that operates purely based on inertial navigation is a good bit harder and more expensive than something that uses an off the shelf GPS device.
Re:Darpa shows off 1.8-gigapixel drone, can spot a person fr... by mseebach on Monday January 28, 2013 @01:37PM (#5129874)
It could operate on visual recognition. It shouldn't be too difficult to find three easily recognisable landmarks around the Mall.
Re:Darpa shows off 1.8-gigapixel drone, can spot a person fr... by sliverstorm on Monday January 28, 2013 @01:27PM (#5129801)
You don't necessarily need a wireless link. You can always use preprogrammed routes. Scouts can simply log data and return with it later, much like the spy planes of old using film cameras. Attacks can similarly be preprogrammed; bombers in war, for example, tend to have fixed targets.

It's the interceptors that would prove the most difficult to operate autonomously; they are the only one whose primary purpose is never fixed.

Rolling with the idea of a drone dystopia, as drones get smart enough you could even rely on the drone to make its own decisions and respond without an external operator.

Re:Darpa shows off 1.8-gigapixel drone, can spot a person fr... by rayiner on Monday January 28, 2013 @01:33PM (#5129844)
One of the things that makes cheap drones possible is easily accessible, off-the-shelf, cheap and lightweight computer/GPS/wireless hardware. Losing GPS and having to use inertial guidance makes the problem a lot more expensive and complicated, and advanced AI is like manned missions to mars--always further off than it looks.
Re:Darpa shows off 1.8-gigapixel drone, can spot a person fr... by sliverstorm on Monday January 28, 2013 @01:36PM (#5129861)
Ok, so you are specifically referring to GPS. I agree, GPS is important for cheap and easy navigation. I was presuming you were talking about a link to a base-station.

Of course, aren't all the GPS satellites already government satellites in the first place? Seems like they wouldn't need to jam the signal, they could just shut them down, or maybe GPS can be set to require authentication...