News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I'm sorry by dmix on Thursday January 24, 2013 @12:07AM (#5107523)
This may have to do with rubyist who have a distaste for Node (and Javascript) in general (which is actually quite common) more than the JS itself.
Re:I'm sorry by codewright on Thursday January 24, 2013 @12:24AM (#5107589)
I'm a Pythonista that loves JavaScript and thinks Node.js is a waste of effort on the part of humanity.
Re:I'm sorry by scriptproof on Thursday January 24, 2013 @03:07AM (#5108302)
I fear that few programmers understand the perspectives brought by Node and JS.
Re:I'm sorry by codewright on Thursday January 24, 2013 @10:54PM (#5113852)
Node.js didn't bring anything new to the table. We've had event loops and non-blocking code for almost half a century.

Don't lump JS into this.

Re:I'm sorry by jmspring on Thursday January 24, 2013 @01:34AM (#5107977)
I'm mostly ambivalent. Node, to me, feels like an attempt to bring twisted to server side JS.
Re:I'm sorry by fourstar on Thursday January 24, 2013 @02:38AM (#5108216)
How much have you used it?
Re:I'm sorry by nkohari on Thursday January 24, 2013 @05:49PM (#5112779)
Hyperbolic much?
Re:I'm sorry by bodegajed on Thursday January 24, 2013 @12:52AM (#5107735)
That's an unfair presumption. That's just a coming from a few twitter users and it doesn't really represent the whole rubyist community.
Re:I'm sorry by GraemeLion on Thursday January 24, 2013 @08:59AM (#5109495)
I've found the whole rubyist community to be somewhat hateful towards any other languages. It makes it hard to want to use the language when the suggestions I get on my "gems" are "that's not ruby-enough of a name" or "You need to break out of your python mode, your name isn't clever enough" :P