MIT website hacked by Lulzsec

Re:MIT website hacked by Lulzsec by negativity on Tuesday January 22, 2013 @12:49PM (#5098433)

I'd just like to take the time to point out, that this is a direct link to a compromised page.

Sure, the message is championing a tragic victim, but do you see how this isn't exactly the wisest move?

Do I need to call attention to the recent Java zero-day exploit?

http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/01/10/new-java-vulnerabil...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MIT website hacked by Lulzsec by ryancl on Tuesday January 22, 2013 @12:50PM (#5098440)

Who runs java?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MIT website hacked by Lulzsec by dthunt on Wednesday January 23, 2013 @10:31PM (#5107004)

Everyone at MIT (required to do a bunch of kerberos related shit)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MIT website hacked by Lulzsec by zokier on Tuesday January 22, 2013 @01:27PM (#5098698)

As if no other software has 0days.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MIT website hacked by Lulzsec by negativity on Tuesday January 22, 2013 @03:08PM (#5099274)

Well, it's just an example. When a page is still compromised, and under the control of someone unexpected, you can't really anticipate the state of the page, and what it might deliver to your computer. I pointed that one out because it's a pretty recent drive-by exploit. You dig?

[ Parent | on HN ]