News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linus says Carmen Ortiz is lying by btilly on Friday January 18, 2013 @04:07AM (#5077804)
I pulled the $1.5 million figure from http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2013/01/12/aaron-swartz/.

The justice system is required to provide an attorney if you can't get your own. However if you look at http://www.innocenceproject.org/ you'll find that incompetent representation is one of the major causes of innocent people losing these cases. Furthermore in Aaron's case he's being charged under a fairly specialized part of the law, so his odds with a generic defense lawyer against a prosecutor who has specialized in computer crimes would be very poor.

And yes, there is a lot seriously wrong with our system.

Re:Linus says Carmen Ortiz is lying by pacala on Friday January 18, 2013 @07:32AM (#5078316)
Given how the rest of the society works, I'd be not surprised that "incompetent" really means "poorly connected" and that the whole system is just a $1.5 million racket to get a "well connected" lawyer to grease your case.
Re:Linus says Carmen Ortiz is lying by betterunix on Friday January 18, 2013 @09:04AM (#5078608)
No, in this case, incompetent means "incompetent." Public defenders are often inexperienced and overworked, and are notorious for advising their clients to accept plea bargains rather than go to trial.
Re:Linus says Carmen Ortiz is lying by atirip on Friday January 18, 2013 @09:24AM (#5078694)
Then you are really are fucked indeed. As an example here (Estonia) state pointed lawyers are choosen from reputable offices only, and they are forced to do that.
Re:Linus says Carmen Ortiz is lying by glurgh on Friday January 18, 2013 @11:13AM (#5079336)
The cases the Innocence Project deals with are invariably state cases, the quality of federal public defenders is significantly higher.