Re:AI unlocks Gödel's notebooks, said to contain hundreds of...
by ShinyLeftPad on Friday November 13, 2026 @01:43PM
(#50487911)
so what would the new incentives be? don't publish... and get paid anyway?
Re:AI unlocks Gödel's notebooks, said to contain hundreds of...
by hobo123 on Friday November 13, 2026 @02:00PM
(#50488140)
At least that's how traditional Western universities used to work. The profs sometimes published something, and they taught students. Looking at science back then, it seemed to work out rather well.
Re:AI unlocks Gödel's notebooks, said to contain hundreds of...
by ShinyLeftPad on Friday November 13, 2026 @02:01PM
(#50488152)
True.
Re:AI unlocks Gödel's notebooks, said to contain hundreds of...
by mohamedkoubaa on Friday November 13, 2026 @03:37PM
(#50489310)
If possible, this would be ideal.
Re:AI unlocks Gödel's notebooks, said to contain hundreds of...
by soulofmischief on Friday November 13, 2026 @01:44PM
(#50487918)
[delayed]
Re:AI unlocks Gödel's notebooks, said to contain hundreds of...
by _bent on Friday November 13, 2026 @02:05PM
(#50488217)
you can just write a doc with your proof/idea, hash it and post that hash on twitter
Re:AI unlocks Gödel's notebooks, said to contain hundreds of...
by soulofmischief on Friday November 13, 2026 @04:51PM
(#50490400)
Yes, you can. So maybe we'll see an adoption of that paradigm, or another. The value of a ZKP is that you can optionally prove some facts up front about the file, whereas a normal hash is all-or-nothing. You can't reveal part of the information because you need the entire contents to properly verify the hash.
Re:AI unlocks Gödel's notebooks, said to contain hundreds of...
by mjd on Friday November 13, 2026 @04:28PM
(#50490012)
ceiiinosssttuv
Re:AI unlocks Gödel's notebooks, said to contain hundreds of...
by soulofmischief on Friday November 13, 2026 @04:53PM
(#50490422)
[delayed]
This has been a problem long before Godel: famously, Newton tried to get credit for inventing Calculus only after Leibniz published his work, leading to a bitter dispute that lasted long after they both died.
I wonder if this problem is now going to be significantly exacerbated by AI, as mathematicians are getting more incentives to keep their works secret —
— or, to the contrary, the community will get a push to publish incomplete ideas, scratch work, etc. early to establish a record of thinking about a problem before others did.
In the end, as always, it's a social problem created by " publish or perish " institutional incentives which reward (and require!) published results, but not the work that led to to them.
This, I hope, will finally change.