News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jonathan Blow – If AI Solved Coding, Why Is My Software S... by bsenftner on Friday November 13, 2026 @11:16AM (#50485682)
The communication skills to create the synchronized understandings necessary for teams of any moderate size to operate in concert is not there. Communications are everything when it comes to collaborations at any level, and we as an entire civilization are weak at this aspect. This effective communication necessity.
Re:Jonathan Blow – If AI Solved Coding, Why Is My Software S... by coffeebeqn on Friday November 13, 2026 @11:30AM (#50485882)
Also AI don’t seem to make communication better, worse if anything. I’m so sick of the whole team not understanding what is going on with Claude written docs and tickets
Re:Jonathan Blow – If AI Solved Coding, Why Is My Software S... by superxpro12 on Friday November 13, 2026 @11:50AM (#50486173)
a lot of what i do with ai is write (gasp) requirements. which is horrifying to engineers for some reason.
Re:Jonathan Blow – If AI Solved Coding, Why Is My Software S... by jurgenburgen on Friday November 13, 2026 @12:15PM (#50486561)
I love requirements. Slop, not so much.
Re:Jonathan Blow – If AI Solved Coding, Why Is My Software S... by sgt101 on Friday November 13, 2026 @12:22PM (#50486649)
it's good to write requirements,

but when you have requirements,

why not render the code to fulfil them?

Re:Jonathan Blow – If AI Solved Coding, Why Is My Software S... by ben_w on Friday November 13, 2026 @01:00PM (#50487259)
> but when you have requirements,

> why not render the code to fulfil them?

Because 95% of the time the LLM can turn the requirements into code, faster, cheaper, and with fewer defects on the first attempt, than most humans.

Re:Jonathan Blow – If AI Solved Coding, Why Is My Software S... by CrimsonCape on Friday November 13, 2026 @02:29PM (#50488518)
Your point needs to be emphasized more. Today is the worse AI will ever be, and it's still better than the average person. Recursive self-improvement will make it even better, maybe on orders of magnitude. When you task an AI, it will be able to walk upward abstractly to ask "is this even a good approach." AI's are good for compartmentalized tasks now, but the architectural tasks will probably be improved in the future.
Re:Jonathan Blow – If AI Solved Coding, Why Is My Software S... by bsenftner on Friday November 13, 2026 @03:49PM (#50489432)
I can imagine the meltdown when AI starts telling its users "that is not how it would work best, consider this ____" and they rant on about their need for and constant use of their "I don't care, do what I say" clipboard loaded paste.
Re:Jonathan Blow – If AI Solved Coding, Why Is My Software S... by ben_w on Friday November 13, 2026 @04:12PM (#50489721)
I'm not generally sold on the "worthy successor" or "human disempowerment would be good" arguments (seems like jumping straight to Hard Mode of alignment when we've not even read the tutorial) but this is one of the ways it might be best for the AI to just… disregard what we say and do something else instead.
Re:Jonathan Blow – If AI Solved Coding, Why Is My Software S... by bsenftner on Friday November 13, 2026 @06:42PM (#50491780)
We'll get to a point where the best practices are to "tell AI what you want to do, and allow it to tell you how you're going to do it".
Re:Jonathan Blow – If AI Solved Coding, Why Is My Software S... by bsenftner on Friday November 13, 2026 @03:54PM (#50489506)
I wonder how much of your requirements would / could be reinterpreted as a dependency graph of logical constraints. I think we may end up with "writing software" to end up being writing such logic + process dependency graphs in plain language. And by extension, given we're talking about people here, committees will form and hammering these out is the new politics.