Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by HDThoreaun on Friday November 13, 2026 @09:54AM
(#50484432)
Ok but to me this just means that someone is going to use grok to create malware. I do not think that means anthropic should also let people use their product to create malware. Monitoring interactions isnt exactly foolproof. The user has already convinced the AI that its doing defensive cybersecurity here. If the claim is that anthropic is more interested in protecting their image than actually reducing cyber crime, sure I agree with that. But Im not sure thats a terrible thing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by Bender on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:08AM
(#50484657)
Grok will refuse to create any offensive security related code which in my opinion is the right balance. I do not believe Anthropic is about protecting their image [1] but rather up-selling enterprise features.
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by HDThoreaun on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:37AM
(#50485076)
Grok will try to refuse any offensive cybersecurity work but it’s too easy to disguise offensive work as defensive work. I don’t think it is possible to devise an algorithm that allows defensive work but not offensive work with high certainty.
I guess I don’t see why other models doing bad things means Anthropic should let Claude do bad things too. Anthropic will get blamed if Claude builds malware. They won’t get blamed if grok or deepseek does.