Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by zero_23784 on Friday November 13, 2026 @09:14AM
(#50483805)
Everytime ai systems entered a domain, experts of that domain have been proven wrong. Biology will be similar. Here is the point, to be able drive huge improvements in a field, you do not need to know everything about that domain. Yes, biology is messy, but we already had incredible breakthroughs in this domain without understanding it 100%. Did we have the full picture when we created antibiotics, vaccines etc.? Maybe solving the big diseases do not require the amount of detail/experience people assume. Maybe we have/will have enough data to extrapolate and create solutions from imperfect knowledge.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by geraneum on Friday November 13, 2026 @09:25AM
(#50483953)
> Everytime ai systems entered a domain, experts of that domain have been proven wrong.
Every time the AI is being hyped, someone from a different pipeline pops in to remind us how wrong everyone and all the experts are except them.
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by zero_23784 on Friday November 13, 2026 @09:51AM
(#50484371)
Experts being wrong about a prediction in their domain is newsworthy, of course people are gonna point that out. They know their domain but they don't know/understand the extent of the power of AI.
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by geraneum on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:15AM
(#50484746)
> Experts being wrong about a prediction in their domain is newsworthy
this is your motte, but your bailey was the one I quoted: “_Everytime_ ai systems entered… experts have been proven wrong”.
Which of course, hasn’t happened in this timeline.
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by rimliu on Friday November 13, 2026 @09:26AM
(#50483983)
Which domains were they proven wrong in?
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by coffeebeqn on Friday November 13, 2026 @09:30AM
(#50484037)
SWE, Math
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by WarmWash on Friday November 13, 2026 @09:38AM
(#50484170)
CAD and Classic Engineering are getting saturated now too.
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by notnullorvoid on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:52AM
(#50485301)
I can't speak for math, but from a SWE perspective I'd say it's a very mixed bag.
One thing is clear that AI produces software faster, but the net results of that haven't really shown to be positive. There's undoubtedly more software now, but quality isn't improving. There's real downsides too like professionals unskilling themselves, and the cycle of low quality source being fed back into training.
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by CrimsonRain on Friday November 13, 2026 @04:18PM
(#50489847)
Please show evidence that quality isn't improving. Also, maintaining same quality but delivering more is still a big win.
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by NoDodgeQuestion on Friday November 13, 2026 @09:31AM
(#50484068)
Everytime definitely not, sometimes ai system find unmapped maya pyramid, turns out pyramid was mapped previously
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med...
by datsci_est_2015 on Friday November 13, 2026 @09:54AM
(#50484438)
Can't wait until AI systems enter the domain of infinite abundance. Stupid experts have been telling me my perpetual motion machine is crank science but I know they're just short-sighted losers.