Your analogy doesn't take into account political activism, which is acknowledged as a social good in the US almost every time our founding story is taught. Even then it would be a bad analogy.
A restraining order is also very different from the threat of excessive imprisonment.
If it was a threat of excessive imprisonment in your hypothetical situation, yes, the courts and laws would get a share in the blame. Not specifically for committing suicide, but for making your life needlessly worse.
Re:Aaron Swartz commits suicide
by colin_jack on Saturday January 12, 2013 @11:57AM
(#5048179)
Its not really comparable though. As far as its been written up he was facing the potential of over 50 years in prison.
That would put anyone under a massive amount of pressure, and does seem pretty unpleasant given his "crime" was so small.
Would you be sitting here blaming the girl and the restraining order laws in the US?
I feel like many people here are trying to get their own opinions out by blaming the law that he broke (and the government).